Legal Opinion

Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management Office

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 2001No. 25342PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Acting Chief Justice:

This dispute involves the State’s multi-million dollar contract with appellant Unisys Corporation for the implementation of a state-wide automated child support enforcement system as required under the federal Family Support Act of 1988. Unisys appeals the dismissal of its complaint. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 22, 1993, respondent Information Technology Management Office (ITM Office) issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting bids for a child support enforcement system. The system was to be in effect by October 1, 1995. After a bidder’s contest to the February…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Gamble v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dema v. Tenet Physician Services-Hilton Head, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Capital City Insurance v. BP Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. 184 Windsor Avenue, LLC. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Madison v. American Home Products Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API