Legal Opinion

Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Co. v. Consumers' Fruit Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1914No. 3937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Action by the Consumers’ Fruit Company against the Chest-nutt-Gibbons Grocer Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GARBRAITH, C.

The one assignment of error urged for the reversal of the judgment appealed from in this cause is that the trial court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff.

The record shows that the Consumers’ Fruit Company was a California corporation, with offices at San Francisco, in that state; that it was engaged in the business of the sale and distribution of dried fruits; that the plaintiff in error was a wholesale grocery company, doing business at the city of Muskogee, Okla.; that in the summer of the year 1907 the Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Company,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Homeland Realty Co. v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Duncan Cotton Oil Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Jones v. First State Bank of BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Dew v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Phoenix Ins. Co. of Hartford v. NewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Phinnie v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Messman v. WiltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API