Legal Opinion
Dew v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 21, 1928No. 18032PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, Y.
C. J. This action was commenced by the defendant in error to recover from the plaintiffs in error on a redelivery bond which had been filed in a re-plevin action wherein Robert W. Walsh, sole trader and doing business as the Auto Loan Company, was plaintiff and Ed Dew was lefendant. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.
Walsh filed a replevin suit against Ed Dew for the possession of a certain automobile, which was taken by the sheriff of Oklahoma county under a writ of replevin on July 23, 1924. Thereafter, Dew…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morris v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Gerber v. WehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Ginner & Miller Publishing Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Caldwell v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Co. v. Consumers' Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Waldmann v. WaldmannCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp. v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Lierly v. Motor Mtg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wortham v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.