Legal Opinion

Lucas v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2011No. 28S01-1102-CV-78PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

In this case, a mortgage holder filed a foreclosure action against the loan borrowers. In response, the borrowers asserted numerous legal defenses and claims against the mortgage holder and loan ser-*459vicer. The borrowers asked for a jury trial on these defenses and claims, but the trial court denied the request. We affirm and hold that the borrowers’ claims and defenses shall be tried in equity because the core legal questions presented by the borrowers’ defenses and claims are significantly intertwined with the subject matter of the foreclosure action.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Carmichael v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Field v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Songer v. Civitas BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cunningham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Estate of Nathaniel Kappel v. William Kappel, Judith Kappel, and Mark KappelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Joel Stoffel v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage AssociationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Rebecca Thorley & Monica Baxter v. Donald E. Nowlin, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  4. Stoffel v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. UTILITY CENTER, INC. v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API