Hillman v. Hulett
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Macomb; Tucker, J. Assumpsit by W. S. Hillman against Bert Hulett and Allie Hulett for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Bert Hulett brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Plaintiff is an undertaker in Tuscarora, Nev. He brings this suit to recover for a casket and shipping box in which the body of one L. F. Harris, the father of defendant Allie and father-in-law of defendant Bert, was shipped from Tuscarora, Nev., to Armada, Mich. The suit was tried before the court, who made a finding of facts and rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants (who are husband and wife). Defendant Bert alone appeals, and asks a reversal of that judgment upon four grounds:(1) There is no testimony tending to establish his liability.(3) There was no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heyn v. O'HagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Durgin v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Anderson v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- McPherson v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Wright v. ReineltMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
- Timmerman v. BultmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Austin v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Benjamin v. BondyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Hoek v. Township of AllendaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1910