Hoek v. Township of Allendale
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Assumpsit by Peter Hoek against the township of Allendale and Lloyd Molyneaux, highway commissioner, upon a contract of indemnity. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Hoek worked his highway tax under direction of an overseer. He plowed up certain growing grain near the center of the road. He claims to have been sued by Schmidt, the man who sowed the grain, and to have suffered judgment in both justice and circuit courts, and to have paid the latter. He thereupon sued the highway commissioner, one Molyneaux, and the town*573ship, claiming the right to recover from one, or both, the amount paid upon the judgment, and for disbursements, and compensation for his time in preparing for and attending the suit. In support of his action, he proved that the highway in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Nicholson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Russell v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Dickinson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Davock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meadows v. Depco Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. General Electric Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mally v. Excelsior Wrapper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Maffei v. Berrien CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.