Legal Opinion

Wright v. Reinelt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Assumpsit by John L. Wright against John Reinelt And Charles Reinelt for work and labor. From a judganent for plaintiff against defendant Charles, the latter '¡brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

Plaintiff brought suit in justice’s court, and recovered a verdict against both defendants. Both appealed. In the circuit court, plaintiff recovered verdict against defendant Charles, and the jury found defendant John not liable. The suit was for work and labor, claiming balance on settlement. In the circuit court, defendants pleaded a set-off.

The record contains none of the testimony, and the sole point raised is on the charge of the court. From this it appears that defendant Charles admitted his liability. The sole contention of defendant is that the suit was based apon a joint liability,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durgin v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoek v. Township of AllendaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hillman v. HulettMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cunningham v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Strohschein v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API