Legal Opinion
Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Barker
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 4, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Reversing.
The question is whether Jefferson County must pay to the appellant sewer service charges for the court house, armory and other county buildings. The circuit ■court held it need not.
The statute empowers the Metropolitan Sewer District, “To fix and collect sewer rates, rentals, and other charges, for service rendered by the facilities of the ■district.” KRS 76.080(10). This is repeated and made specific in KRS 76.090(1) declaring:
“Upon taking and assuming control of such exist ing* sewer and drainage system the district is authorized to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- City of Louisville v. Cromwell, TreasurerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Veail v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Strand Amusement Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- City of Mt. Sterling v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Bexar County v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Patterson v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- City of Covington v. Sanitation District No. 1 of Campbell & Kenton CountiesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.