Legal Opinion

Veail v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 8, 1946PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

• — Affirming.

This action was instituted by appellant, Virginia Veail, a resident, taxpayer, and user of the sewer system of the City of Louisville, and Norbourne O. Rudy, a resident, taxpayer, and prospective user of a sewer system in the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District, suing for themselves and all others in their respective categories and situations. The petitioners seek a declaration of rights between them and those for whom they sue, and the defendants, members of the Board of Louisville and Jefferson County…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Klein v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Estes v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Kirch v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  5. Sanitation Dist. No. 1 of Jeff. Co. v. City of Lville.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API