Legal Opinion
Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided February 6, 1948PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Reversing.
The Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District was created under an enabling act. Acts of 1946, Cb. 104, now Chapter 76, Kentucky Revised Statutes. The act was held constitutional in Veail v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dis trict, 303 Ky. 248, 197 S. W. 2d 413. By virtue of the statute and the action of the Board of Aldermen of Louisville and the Fiscal Court of Jefferson County, there was transferred to the District the “complete jurisdiction, control, possession and supervision” of all the existing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Fowler v. Obier, City Building InspectorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Simrall & Co. v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Commonwealth v. Payne Medicine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Veail v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- City of Texarkana v. WigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Louisville v. SebreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. County of BooneKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Spalding v. City of Granite CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.