Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Seal & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 21, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 85-1797 (CRR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The above-entitled cause of action was transferred to the undersigned Judge on July 19, 1993, from the docket of the Honorable George H. Revereomb. At issue in the case is an attempt by Plaintiff Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) to seek reimbursement from Defendants Seal & Co. (“Seal”) and Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation (“Bechtel”) for repairs completed on a damaged escalator in the Tenleytown Metrorail Station.
On May 5, 1993, Judge Revereomb issued an Opinion and Order in this matter, affirming the administrative…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gwendolyn Y. Bell v. May Department Stores Company, a New York Corporation, D/B/A HechtsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Sandra I. Londono and Jessica Londono v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Nayereh S. Rassoulpour v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
- Casanova v. Marathon Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008