Legal Opinion

Bell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1984No. 84-133, 84-134PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Chief Judge:

These are cross-appeals from a final judgment following an order granting a new trial in a personal injury action. Plaintiff seeks to reinstate a $65,000 jury verdict in her favor. Defendant has cross-appealed. 1 We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. Hence, we remand for reinstatement of the jury verdict.

On April 9,1979, the plaintiff, Mrs. Patricia A. Bell, suffered injuries when her foot suddenly became caught in Escalator Number Five at the Eastern Market Metrorail Station, causing her to fall. Escalator Number Five was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Alonzo Wayne Taylor v. The Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Knell v. FeltmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  4. Quin v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Georgia Hall and Edward Hall v. General Motors Corporation, Buick Division, Larry Buick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lyons v. BarrazottoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Twyman v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Otis Elevator Co. v. TuerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Durphy v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API