United States v. Hercules Antiques
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, Abstract 59910, sustaining the protest of appellees, and overruling the collector’s classification of the involved merchandise as an indirect importation from Czechoslovakia. The collector refused to give the importers the benefit of the trade agreement applicable to importations from Holland, but inapplicable to nations under Communist domination.
The pertinent parts of the statues and the Presidential proclamations are:
Paragraph 218 (f), Tariff Act of 1930: ' '(f) Table and kitchen articles and utensils,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. Ocean Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Maier v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Hull v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Mohammad Reza EhsanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Belcrest Linens v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983