Hull v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43666. [Oral argument Oot. 29, 1920, by Mr. Puolrhalor and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
This case raises a question of practice or procedure rather than one of classification. It is well known that when a,n importer claims free entry for merchandise as “American goods returned,” he is required by the customs regulations to file certain declarations and certificates with the collector in support of the claim: now if in a given case these should be duly filed but the collector nevertheless *212should decide against tbe claim for free entry, the question would arise whether upon the trial of the protest the burden of proof would rest upon the importer to support his claim by evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Erhardt v. SchroederSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. Ranlett & StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Schoenfeld v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- United States v. Ocean Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Lessor v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- United States v. Hercules AntiquesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.