Legal Opinion

Endleman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1898No. 357PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

It is enacted, in section 14 of the act of May 17, 1884, providing a civil government for Alaska (23 Stat. 24, 28), that “the importation, manufacture, and sale of intoxicating liquors in said district except for medical, mechanical and scientific purposes is hereby prohibited under the penalties which are provided in section nineteen hundred and fifty five of the Revised Statutes for the wrongful importation of distilled spirits. And the president of the United States shall make such regulations as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.” By section…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  2. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. Hillman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  4. United States v. MeltzerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API