Hillman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington, Northern Division. Clarence Dayton Hillman was convicted of using the United States mails to defraud, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
[1, 2] The plaintiff in error was indicted in October, 1910, for the offense of using the United States mails to defraud. Upon a trial before a jury he was convicted of the offense charged. On the writ of error from this court, he seeks a reversal of the judgment, relying mainly on errors assigned to the ruling of the trial court in overruling his plea in abatement to the indictment and his motion to quash the indictment. Some two weeks after he wras indicted, he filed his plea in abatement, alleging, in substance, that on September 20, 1910, subpoenas had been issued…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Lawrence KearneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. GoldmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.