Legal Opinion

Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mathis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Carlisle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*48Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

J. A. Mathis and the Continental Insurance Company brought suit against the Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company to recover damages for the destruction by fire of a barn and contents owned by Mathis. At the time of the fire the barn was insured in the Continental Insurance Company, which paid to Mathis the sum of $1,106.65, and the insurance company sought a recovery to that extent on the ground that it had been subrogated to the rights of Mathis. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $2,000.00. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Ohio & Kentucky Railway Co. v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Terhune v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'Keefe v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sawyer v. J. T. Robison Commissioner of General Land OfficeTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fawick Airflex Co. v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 735Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Peck Iron & Metal Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API