Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1927No. Motion No. 7317PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This proceeding is upon motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus. The prayer is that this writ issue requiring the respondent, J. T. Robison, Commissioner of the General Land Office, to issue a permit to the relator authorizing him to prospect for oil and gas on lands which, it is claimed, are public lands. The land involved is some 469 acres lying in the bed of Dixon Creek, in Hutchinson County, Texas.

It is alleged that Dixon Creek is a statutory navigable stream, and that therefore the bed of the stream is the property of the State. This insistence is predicated upon Revised…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nevitt v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fitzgerald v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Chappell v. RoganTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Dunn v. WingTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Strayhorn v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Smith v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Butler v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. McCarty v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API