United States v. Jose Ernesto Moreno-Green, Joaquin Arturo Contreras, Oscar Lara Navarrete, Jose Ignacio Acosta-Medina, and Alejo Hernandez Dominguez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The government moves to dismiss these interlocutory criminal appeals for lack of jurisdiction based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1494, 103 L.Ed.2d 879 (1989). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeals.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 10, 1988, a federal grand jury in Arizona returned an indictment against Jose Ernesto Moreno-Green, Joaquin Arturo Contreras, Oscar Lara Navar-rete, Jose Ignacio Acosta-Medina, and Ale-jo Hernandez-Dominguez. The defendants were charged with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. On August…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. John A. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Bob W. Storey, A/K/A Robert W. Storey, and Robert T. StephanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Roosevelt Taylor, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Jimmy J. Quezada, the People of the Territory of Guam v. Jimmy J. Quezada, and Howard TrappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock, United States of America v. Benjamin CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.