Legal Opinion
United States v. Arnold Sherlock, United States of America v. Benjamin Charley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1989No. 88-1213, 88-1214PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Arnold Sherlock and Benjamin Charley filed this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss their indictments on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct. We lack jurisdiction to hear this interlocutory appeal.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On August 26,1987, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against Arnold Sherlock charging him with rape and statutory rape. The grand jury returned an indictment against Benjamin Charley charging him with rape, statutory rape, and assault with the intent to commit rape. On October 16, 1987,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. DederichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- McKabney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Jimmy J. Quezada, the People of the Territory of Guam v. Jimmy J. Quezada, and Howard TrappCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Pito Quinata CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990