Legal Opinion

United States v. John A. Hickey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 2004No. 02-10197, 02-10204PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

Almost five years after he was first indicted, John A. Hickey filed a number of motions in the district court on the eve of trial. When the motions were denied, Hickey filed two interlocutory appeals, basing appellate jurisdiction on the collateral order doctrine. We determine that none of Hickey’s contentions raises a color-able claim under the collateral order doctrine and dismiss his appeals for lack of jurisdiction.

I

In September 1994, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a civil action against Hickey, his partner, Mamie Tang, and their partnerships.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. LedéeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Benjamin Austin Felipe Cisneros Lorena Cisneros Luis Cisneros Paul Eppinger Raymond Llamas Angel Rivera Richard TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Colon-LedeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Buenaventura Castillo-BasaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API