Pickett v. Bevacqua
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
273 N.J. Super. 1 (1994)
640 A.2d 1173
CHERYL PICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PHILIP BEVACQUA AND FRANK BEVACQUA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 21, 1994.
Decided May 2, 1994.
Before Judges MUIR, Jr., THOMAS,[1] and LEVY.
Sander Perl argued the cause for appellant (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys).
William A. Wenzel argued the cause for respondents (Haggerty, Donohue & Monaghan, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, JR., J.A.D.
This is a verbal threshold case. After the trial court twice directed the jury to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Greenberg v. StanleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Runnacles v. DoddrellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brooks v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Krohn v. NJ Full Ins. UnderwritersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Weiss v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Demers v. SnyderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Wenz v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.