Legal Opinion

Pickett v. Bevacqua

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 2, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

273 N.J. Super. 1 (1994)

640 A.2d 1173

CHERYL PICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

PHILIP BEVACQUA AND FRANK BEVACQUA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 21, 1994.

Decided May 2, 1994.

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., THOMAS,[1] and LEVY.

Sander Perl argued the cause for appellant (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys).

William A. Wenzel argued the cause for respondents (Haggerty, Donohue & Monaghan, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, JR., J.A.D.

This is a verbal threshold case. After the trial court twice directed the jury to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Wright v. BernsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Greenberg v. StanleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Runnacles v. DoddrellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brooks v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Krohn v. NJ Full Ins. UnderwritersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Weiss v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Demers v. SnyderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Wenz v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API