Legal Opinion
Runnacles v. Doddrell
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 1, 1960PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
59 N.J. Super. 363 (1960)
157 A.2d 836
HARRY RUNNACLES AND LOUISE RUNNACLES, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
GRACE DODDRELL AND KENNETH S. DODDRELL, HER HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 12, 1960.
Decided February 1, 1960.
Before Judges GAULKIN, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.
Mr. Joseph E. Connolly argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys).
Mr. William Ward Wimmer argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.
Appeal is taken by defendants from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Panko v. Flintkote Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Connelly v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Takoma Park Bank v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Odegard v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roman v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Amaru v. StrattonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Muehlebach v. Mercer Mortuary and Chapel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Krohn v. NJ Full Ins. UnderwritersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.