Legal Opinion

Pacific State Bank v. Greene

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 2003No. C039662PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KOLKEY, J.

This case raises the question whether the parol evidence rule bars a party from offering evidence that her signature on an agreement was procured by a misrepresentation over the content of the physical document to be signed. The aggrieved party claims that she agreed to guarantee a single loan and that a bank employee misrepresented on the day of signing that the guaranty agreements at issue related only to that single loan. But although that single loan’s number and amount were specified at the top of the guaranty agreements, the agreements’ fine print defined the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Julius Castle Restuarant, Inc. v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Zimmer v. NawabiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API