Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Introduction
In this copyright infringement action involving stock photography, defendant *964moves for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, defendant’s motion is Granted.
Statement
Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc., is a stock photography agency that licenses photographs to publishers. Defendant Pearson Education, Inc., is a publisher of educational textbooks. It is undisputed that Pearson purchased licenses from Minden for thousands of photographs for use in Pearson’s educational publications. Min-den…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nancey Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Atel Financial Corp., a California Corporation v. Quaker Coal Company, a Kentucky CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pacific State Bank v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Nafal v. CarterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Minden Pictures, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. DRK PhotoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Pacific Stock, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Alaska Stock, LLC v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.