Legal Opinion

Central National Bank v. Brecheisen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1902No. 12,808PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Osage district court; William Thomson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action brought by Henry Brecheisen as plaintiff in the court below against the plaintiffs in error to recover on a replevin bond. The facts out of which the controversy arose may be briefly stated. The Central National Bank held a chattel mortgage on cattle and hogs. One R. B. Vail was the mortgagor. On April 3, 1899, the bank filed its petition, based upon its right to possession under its mortgage, and an affidavit in replevin, to recover twenty head of steers and fifty hogs, alleged to be in Brecheisen’s possession, and also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ely v. . CarnleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Case v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  3. Gillespie v. Brown & Ryan Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Corning v. AshleyNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sammons v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hess-Harrington, Inc. v. State Exchange BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Wertheimer Degen v. ShulticeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Willys-Overland Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. International Harvester Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API