Wertheimer Degen v. Shultice
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorliNg, J.
I. The original petition alleged that the plaintiffs were copartners. An amendment to the petition charged collusion to defraud. A substituted petition alleged that the defendant was a corporation. Because of these matters, defendant says that plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest, and have abandoned their rights under the mortgage. These claims are without merit.
II. Defendant .claims that the mortgage was executed in Nebraska, and that its validity must be determined by the laws of Nebraska. He pleads, but has not proved, a Nebraska statute declaring every mortgage not followed by…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Coder v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Grandison v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Producers Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- New v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Summer Thomas v. LawlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- United States v. Cedar Valley Livestock Exchange, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.