Legal Opinion

Corning v. Ashley

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from special term, Albany county. Action by Erastus Corning against Leurendus B. Ashley and others. Judgment was given for plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

On the 11th day of September, 1884, Huntington, one of defendants, executed a mortgage on the horses in question, and other horses owned by him, to Ashley, Reynolds, and Freeman, other of the defendants, and to Corning, the plaintiff. This mortgage was, first, to secure Ashley in one year $3,120.35, and, after paying Ashley, then to pay in one year whatever he might owe the others above named. Only about $122 has been paid Ashley. On the 1st of November, 1885, Huntington sent some of the horses to Corning, to be cared for, kept, and pastured, and on the 17th of April, 1886, another. Corning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charter v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Bissell v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Scott v. . DelahuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peter Barrett Manufacturing Co. v. RonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Drummond Carriage Co. v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johanns v. . FickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. GoodrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Central National Bank v. BrecheisenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API