Legal Opinion

Charles O. Martin, Raymond F. Farrar and Wife, Hazel M. Farrar, and Floyd B. Martin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1957No. 7261PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree granting an injunction in an action instituted by the United States, as the owner of a limited-access highway, to restrain adjoining landowners from trespassing on a strip of land adjacent thereto in an attempt to build an access road onto the highway. The court below granted the injunction on the ground that the United States was the owner of the strip of land, having acquired it from the State of North Carolina, which, in turn, had acquired it from the predecessor in title of the defendant landowners. The case was tried on the pleadings…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Yancey v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Penn v. Carolina Virginia Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Bedford AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Browning v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1958
  5. United States v. Roy Tibbals Wilson, State of Iowa, Omaha Indian Tribe, Etc. v. Harold Jackson, State of Iowa and Iowa State Conservation Commission, Omaha Indian Tribe v. Agricultural & Industrial Investment Co., State of Iowa and Iowa State Conservation Commission, United States of America v. Roy Tibbals Wilson, Omaha Indian Tribe, Etc. v. Harold Jackson, Omaha Indian Tribe v. Agricultural & Industrial Investment Company United States of America v. Roy Tibbals Wilson, Rgp, Inc. And Otis Peterson, Omaha Indian Tribe, Etc. v. Harold Jackson, Otis Peterson, Omaha Indian Tribe v. Agricultural & Industrial Investment Co., Rgp, Inc. And Otis PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API