Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1959No. 7793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

This case is here for the second time. See Martin v. United States, 4 Cir., 240 F.2d 326. We there held that the mere filing of a map by the State of North Carolina showing a strip of land one hundred feet wide and approximately one mile long, its center being the center line of an existing public road, was not a taking of private property within the boundaries of the designated strip. Mindful, however, that there may have been other acts constituting a taking, we remanded the case for further proceedings. Thereafter, additional evidence was taken, in much conflict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Hiatt v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Sanders v. . SmithfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Sanders v. Town of SmithfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Hallyburton v. Slagle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Garcia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Weintraub v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. Wake Payne and Delight Payne, His Wife, United States of America v. Lowell C. Ferguson and Joan M. Ferguson, His Wife, United States of America v. Buena Foster, United States of America v. Emzie Eller and L. E. Eller, Her Husband, United States of America v. Julia Dixie Eller and Vaden G. Eller, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API