Legal Opinion

Yancey v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1942PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbe question presented by tbis appeal is whether the respondent as an agency of the State can he required by the court to pay interest on a judgment against it from the date of its rendition until paid.

From the facts set out in the petitioners’ motion, admitted by the demurrer, it appears that judgment on the verdict was rendered 12 December, 1941, at a term of court which began 1 December, 1941, and that compensation for the taking of petitioners’ property was fixed as of the trial in the sum of $56,250. On 19 December, 1941, oral tender of the exact amount of the judgment, in full…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Schloss v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Tully v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API