Legal Opinion

Browning v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1964No. 394PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, C.J.

The rather careless and haphazard manner in procuring rights of way, together with the lack of clarity and accurateness in the preparation of right of way agreements by the Commission through the years, has been a source of much litigation.

The court below held that the Commission obtained by purchase from Pernelia C. Browning on 7 April 1949, a right of way 50 feet from the center of Highway 52 as it existed in 1949, and that because of the procurement of such right of way the plaintiff herein is barred from recovering any damages in connection therewith.

We concur in the ruling of the court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Penn v. Carolina Virginia Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kirby v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Barbour v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Barbour v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API