Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1950No. S. F. 17938PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an action for damages for the wrongful death of Ralph Daniel Gonzales. It was originally commenced by Jeraldine Gonzales, as surviving widow, and Kenneth David Gonzales, a minor, claiming to be the son of the decedent. William Gonzales, admittedly the son of the decedent by a previous marriage, was permitted to intervene in the action. The decedent was killed on February 11, 1946, when his taxicab crashed into a Greyhound bus that had skidded out of control and was blocking the highway a short distance above a sharp turn around which the decedent, coming from the opposite direction,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API