Legal Opinion

Condict v. Hewitt

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1962No. 3028PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

delivered the-opinion of the court.

This is a civil assault and battery casein which the appellant, Winthrop C. Con-dict, Jr., has appealed from a judgment awarded to appellee, Joseph R. Hewitt, by District Judge Vernon G. Bentley. The case was tried without a jury. The judgment consisted of $86 for special damages,. $250 for pain and suffering, and $500 as-exemplary damages.

The assault complained of grew out of' a controversy over water rights. Hewitt was demanding additional water out of Elk; Hollow Creek, from Water Commissioner Herbert King. He had threatened to bring a mandamus action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Heinze v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Wilson v. HallWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Powell v. MeiersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Williams v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cox v. StolworthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Adel v. ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Roberts Construction Company v. VondriskaWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API