Legal Opinion
Heinze v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 3, 1942No. [No. 21, January Term, 1942.]PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtForsythe, J.
On June 17, 1941, the appellee, Carl Murphy, filed a suit in the Baltimore City Court against the appellant, Horace A. Heinze, a Baltimore City policeman, for assault and battery and for false imprisonment. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and it resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the appellee for 81,000. This appeal is from that judgment.
From the evidence the undisputed facts are that on May 2, 1941, the appellee’s wife was driving an automobile on Thirty-third Street, in Baltimore City, and had a collision with another automobile driven by Miss Evelyn Faupel.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Sloan v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HoeflichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.