Legal Opinion
Boston & Maine Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 4, 1966No. 65 Civ. 3711PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TTr_r, _. , . WYATT, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff Boston and Maine Corporation (“B&M”) for summary judgment on the first claim in its complaint (Fed.R.Civ.P. 56), and for an order striking as insufficient and immaterial all of the complete and partial defenses of defendant Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad (“Burlington”). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f).
In an order with opinion being filed herewith, leave is being granted to Burlington to serve an amended (partly supplemental) answer and counterclaims. Accordingly, the present motion to strike defenses will be considered with respect…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. Lehigh & New England RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Sandford Laundry, Inc. v. SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marth v. Industrial Incomes Incorporated of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Boston & Maine Corp. v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Boston and Maine Corporation v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Persian Cultural Found. v. Napolitano, Pc/00-0613 (r.I.super. 2006)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Persian Cultural Foundation v. NapolitanoSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008