Legal Opinion

Boston & Maine Corp. v. Illinois Central Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 1967No. 66 Civ. 3849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERLANDS, District Judge.

In this action commenced on November 18, 1966 primarily to enforce an arbitration award, the following three motions are now before the Court: (1) defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for a stay of proceedings; (2) plaintiff’s motion to strike defenses, to dismiss or to sever counterclaims, and for summary judgment on the First Claim of its complaint, the claim seeking enforcement of the arbitration award; and (3) defendant’s motion for leave to file and serve an amended answer.

Except for differences in legal maneuvering, the controversy between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Allen W. Reeves v. Charles Tarvizian, TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  3. Boston and Maine Corporation v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Boston & Maine Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marcy Smiga v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., and Raymond B. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  3. Boston and Maine Corporation v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Reyes Compania Naviera S.A. v. Manumante S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Amalgamated Food & Allied Workers Union, Local 56 v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API