Legal Opinion
Boston and Maine Corporation v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 25, 1967No. 31033_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal seeks reversal of the disposition of this litigation by Judge Wyatt of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a disposition upon appellee’s motion for summary judgment 1 adequately explained as to the merits of the controversy in Judge Wyatt’s excellent opinion reported at 258 F.Supp. 930 (1966). We affirm the judgment below and do so substantially on that opinion.
We believe we are required to point out, however, that though judicial enforcement of the arbitration award, the unanimous act of the Arbitration Committee, was proper, we, unlike the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In the Matter of a Motion to Compel Arbitration Between Hellenic Lines, Ltd., and Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Boston & Maine Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patricia SHUMWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Hamilton Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Network Cinema Corporation v. GlassburnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Boston & Maine Corp. v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes, Inc. v. CsakyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.