Legal Opinion

Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 17, 1958No. 310PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases concern the range of the Interstate Commerce Commission’s power over rates for car hire in railroading. Because they predominantly originate freight, long-haul trunk-line railroads own most of the freight cars in the industry. Short-haul terminal railroads, on the other hand, mainly terminate freight; to avoid needless duplication, they hire the cars of the long-haul roads rather than replace them with their own. The compensation to be paid for use of another’s cars has, for the most part, been fixed by the railroads themselves, originally in terms of the mileage which borrowed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boston & Maine Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. South Bend Federation of Teachers v. National Education Ass'n-South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Downing v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Jose Edmund Santos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jose Roberto Murillos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API