Legal Opinion

Hardy v. St. Clair

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 15, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Brent D. Hardy and Carie Hardy appeal and David St. Clair cross-appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, Marsano, J.) concluding that a release signed by Brent D. Hardy barred his negligence claim, but did not bar his wife’s claim for loss of consortium. We agree with the trial court and affirm the judgment.

[¶ 2] This action arises from injuries allegedly sustained by Brent D. Hardy at the Wiscasset Raceway, a facility owned by David St. Clair. As a condition to Brent’s service as a member of a pit crew supporting a race car racing at the raceway,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Arnold v. Shawano County Agricultural SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. MacOmber v. DillmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Beaver, Dorothy v. Grand Prix KartingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Forum Financial Group v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2001
  4. Angela M. Smith, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Peter A. Smith v. John R. HensonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  5. Lloyd v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API