Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 25, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, and DANA, JJ.

Dissenting: ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.

RUDMAN, J.

[¶ 1] C. Gary Lloyd appeals from a summary judgment entered in Superior Court (Hancock County, Gorman, J.) in favor of Sugarloaf Mountain Corp. and U.S.A. Cycling, Inc., d/b/a National Off-Road Bicycle Association (NORBA), on Lloyd’s negligence complaint and on their counterclaims for indemnification. Lloyd argues that the two releases he signed prior to the Widowmaker Challenge mountain bicycle race did not effectively discharge Sugar-loaf and NORBA from liability for his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Barnes v. New Hampshire Karting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Schutkowski v. CareyWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Doyle v. Bowdoin CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reliance National Indemnity v. Knowles Industrial Services, Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Zhao v. CIEE, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Lloyd v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API