Legal Opinion

Emery Waterhouse Co. v. Lea

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 4, 1983PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.

The defendants, Gilbert Lea and Emery Associates, were the owners respectively of adjacent buildings on Middle Street, in Portland, Lea owning two of the buildings identified, for purposes of convenience, as buildings # 1 and # 2, while buildings # 3 and # 4 were owned by Emery Associates, hereinafter referred to as the Associates. The Associates had leased from Lea the first and second floors of building # 2 together with part of the basement, and had in turn subleased the same to the plaintiff, The Emery Waterhouse Company (Emery Waterhouse). Emery…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Kroger Company v. GiemTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Packard v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. Roberts v. American Chain & Cable Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bakowski v. Mountain States Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Miller v. SzelenyiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. Acadia Insurance Co. v. Buck Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KoshySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. Fowler v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API