Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The primary issue in this case is whether the Exhibit A release entitles appellees to summary judgment on Bowen’s negligence claim and the loss of consortium claims of Bowen’s wife and children. For the reasons that follow, we find that the Exhibit A release does not entitle appellees to summary judgment on these claims.
In the case at bar, the court of appeals found that Bowen, at his deposition, admitted to having signed the Exhibit A and B releases but that later, in his sworn affidavit, Bowen denied signing the releases. The court of appeals determined that Bowen could not create a genuine…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Reagan v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by196 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Hochendoner v. Genzyme CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Courie v. Alcoa Wheel & Forged ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.