Legal Opinion

Gates v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1978No. 13479-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, in two Industrial Commission matters involving different and successive industrial injuries to the same workman.

We must answer three questions:

1. Was the first injury scheduled or unscheduled?

2. Should All Star Coach v. Industrial Commission, 115 Ariz. 335, 565 P.2d 515 (1977) be applied retroactively?

3. Should the Commission have granted petitioner’s motion to consolidate for the purposes of apportionment?

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Petitioner,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Sickle v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Hester v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API