Stanley W. Smith, Inc. v. Pilgrim
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BARTLETT, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a claim and delivery action, awarding plaintiff possession of a Peerless automobile, and damages for its detention. The complaint alleges that at the time of its filing, which was on November 30, 1925, plaintiff owned the automobile in question, that it was in possession of defendant, that plaintiff had demanded possession before bringing its suit, that defendant refused to deliver possession, that the car was of the value of $1,000, and that plaintiff had been damaged through defendant’s detention of the automobile in the sum of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Garcia v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sidney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guerin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. HorethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943