Legal Opinion

Stanback v. . Haywood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STACY, C. J., and CLARKSON, J., concur. This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage for $16,000, given to the plaintiff's intestate by the defendants to secure eight notes for $2,000 each, four of which have been paid, and to collect any deficiency after application to the debt of the amount received from the foreclosure sale.

The defendants in their answer admitted the execution of the notes and mortgage referred to in plaintiff's complaint, and in their further defense alleged that contemporaneously with the execution of said notes and mortgage a parol agreement was entered into between them and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. . SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Strauss v. City of Wilmington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Merchants National Bank v. Carolina Broom Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Redmond v. . ChandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Haywood County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Johnson v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Bumgardner v. GrooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Stanback v. . HaywoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API