Legal Opinion

Bumgardner v. Groover

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1956No. 235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

With the exception of formal assignments of error, the defendants have only two assignments of error: one, to that part of the order sustaining the demurrer to the first further answer and defense and cause of action for affirmative relief, and two, to that portion of the order allowing the motion to strike from the answer the entire second further answer and defense.

This is not an action based on the $15,000.00 note executed and delivered to plaintiff by the defendants Barney Lee Groover and wife, Mary Lee Groover, as a purchase money note for a farm, and secured by a deed of trust on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Exum v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Exum v. . LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Jenkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Coral Gables, Inc. v. . Ayres.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardin v. American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. N. C. Monroe Construction Co. v. CoanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Sam Stockton Grading Co., Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Sam Stockton Grading Co., Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API