Chapman-Hunt Co. v. Haywood County Board of Education
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Plaintiff alleges that the buildings in question bave been completed and accepted by the defendant. This is denied. It is provided by C. S., 5415, among other things, that all new school buildings “shall be inspected, received and approved by the county superintendent of public instruction before full payment is made therefor.” The issues submitted to the jury, therefore, are insufficient to support the judgment, as they are not determinative of the controversy. The crucial fact of liability is yet undecided. For this reason, a new trial must be awarded. Bank v. Broom Co., 188 N. C., 508, 125…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Emery v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Tucker v. . SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Strauss v. City of Wilmington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Holler v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Merchants National Bank v. Carolina Broom Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Goodwin v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- T. L. Edge v. North State Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Cody v. . EnglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Newbern v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.