Legal Opinion

Miller v. Smith

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1955No. 5871PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ICIKER, Justice.

On the 30th day of April, 1951, plaintiff filed this suit for the recovery of damages for breach of a covenant of warranty in a deed. The deed was executed by defendant on the 23rd day of June, 1941. There was set out an alleged copy of the deed showing that R. Smith, the grantor, defendant in this suit, was a resident of Roosevelt County, and that plaintiff, Beulah Miller, was a resident of the County of Chaves, New Mexico. The deed purported to convey to the grantee certain lands in Winkler County, Texas. The copy of the deed states:

“and I do hereby bind my heirs, executors…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murry v. BelmoreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Oliver v. EnriquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hobbs v. Town of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Clinton v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Dodrill v. State Bank of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. DominguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Hyden v. LAW FIRM OF McCORMICK, ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Richardson Ford Sales v. CumminsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API