In Re Nelson
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This cause arises under our rules for disciplinary proceedings (§ 21-2-1(3), N.M.S.A. 1953). Respondent having filed his exceptions to the report of the hearing commissioners together with a designation of the entire record of proceedings before the commissioners, upon being advised of the estimated cost of the transcript which the respondent must deposit as provided in § 1.12 of the rules, in exceptions and by motion attacks as unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. II, § 18, of the New Mexico Constitution, that portion of the…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Carter v. KublerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Interest of LVNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. County AssessorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matter of Protest of MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- James v. BrumlopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re PattonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.