Legal Opinion

In Re Nelson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1968No. 8533PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This cause arises under our rules for disciplinary proceedings (§ 21-2-1(3), N.M.S.A. 1953). Respondent having filed his exceptions to the report of the hearing commissioners together with a designation of the entire record of proceedings before the commissioners, upon being advised of the estimated cost of the transcript which the respondent must deposit as provided in § 1.12 of the rules, in exceptions and by motion attacks as unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. II, § 18, of the New Mexico Constitution, that portion of the…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Carter v. KublerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of LVNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. County AssessorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Matter of Protest of MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. James v. BrumlopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. In Re PattonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API